HVAC Wiki

All things related to HVAC

User Tools

Site Tools


controls:protocols:bacnet:qna

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
controls:protocols:bacnet:qna [2020/10/03 05:13] – old revision restored (2020/09/30 09:48) 62.138.2.243controls:protocols:bacnet:qna [2020/10/04 07:06] (current) – old revision restored (2020/09/30 22:04) 178.151.245.174
Line 115: Line 115:
  
 - Christoph Zeller - Christoph Zeller
 +
 +
 +
 +===== Status Indicator =====
 +
 +??? Are there any specific requirement for status indicators (LED) for BACnet?
 +
 +We have Module & Network Status Led for Ethernet IP and its behavior is driven from standard.
 +Are there any specific requirement for status indicators for BACnet IP as well? I don’t see any in specifications?
 +
 +-Gajanan S Bhatarkar
 +
 +!!!
 +BACnet does not specify status indicator LEDs, for any of its datalinks. Any status indication on BACnet/IP and other media by LEDs is purely a product determination.
 +
 +- Bernhard Isler
 +
 +===== SubscribeCOVProperty =====
 +??? SubscribeCOVProperty with Large Analog Value Objects
 +
 +While implementing new objects we found a potential issue:
 + 
 +How do I subscribe to the Present Value of a Large Analog Value object?
 +The service seems to use REAL only, DOUBLE seems not to be supported.
 +Is the COV_Increment supposed to support REAL only and we need to convert it internally?
 +
 +- Frank Schubert
 +
 +!!!
 +There was an Interpretation Request started during the last meeting in April dealing with this exact issue.
 + 
 +The basic question was stated as
 +The COV Increment in the SubscribeCOVProperty service is of datatype REAL, but the concept of a COV Increment applies to any numeric datatype (see 13.15.1.1.6). 
 + 
 +The proposed interpretation offered by the author (Carl) was:
 +When the datatype of the monitored property is numeric, and not REAL, the server shall accept the COV Increment and convert it to the datatype of the monitored property.
 + 
 +My memory is that there were some rough edges in the Interpretation Request language that made simple agreement problematic, and the author was going to make a few changes, and resubmit so that this could be resolved.  We have some history with data type coercion in the lighting area (Channel), so it may be possible to use most of the same ideas.
 + 
 +-Cliff Copass
controls/protocols/bacnet/qna.1601702004.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/10/03 05:13 by 62.138.2.243